On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com > wrote:
> > Everyone seems to be happy with the names and behaviour of the GUCs, so > committed. The docs suggest that max_wal_size will be respected during archive recovery (causing restartpoints and recycling), but I'm not seeing that happening. Is this a doc bug or an implementation bug? Cheers, Jeff
