On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:11:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> writes: > > I believe there's been a behavior change, and not sure if it's deliberate. > > I > > don't think there's a negative consequence for our production use, but it > > confused me while summing relpages for analysis purposes, as our 9.4 > > customers > > behaved differently. > > I suspect that you're getting confused because autovacuum kicked in on the
It seems you're right. I was additionally confused because the autovacuum had processed the most recent tables (triggered by insertion; partitioned by date), but had not processed some of last month's tables (which I was querying for relpages, since it's a complete month), since this DB was upgraded to pg9.4 last month. Thanks, Justin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
