On 3/20/15 9:44 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:10:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I've certainly objected to it in the past, but I don't
believe I was the only one objecting.
What's your feeling now?
I'm prepared to yield on the point.
OK, are we up for changing the default pg_ctl shutdown method for
9.5, ("smart" to "fast"), or should we wait for 9.6?
I'm up for it. I think it's long overdue.
+1
+1, but I also like the idea of allowing SU to connect during a smart
shutdown. Even if you've intentionally chosen smart instead of fast it
still sucks that you can't find out what's actually holding things up
(and ps isn't that great a solution).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
