On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:34 PM, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 March 2015 at 22:22, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> On March 22, 2015 6:17:28 AM GMT+01:00, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> >>> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm >> >thinks. >> >> >> >> jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it. >> > >> >All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the difference >> >is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00. >> >> That's due to a different patch though, right? > > > Yes this is due to cc0d90b.
Err, yes. This exp error is caused by the to_char patch (and that's what I meant X)), bad copy-paste from here... -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
