The proposed format is much simpler to manage in a script, and if you're
interested in runtime, its formatting would be less expensive than %t and
%m.
Maybe, but do we really need two? How about just %M?
I guess Tomas put 2 formats because there was 2 time formats to begin
with, but truncating/rouding if someone really wants seconds is quite
easy.
Also, having just one would open the door to calling it something like
%u (for Unix timestamp),
I guess that is okay as well.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
