On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my opinion, Andrew's version is far clearer. Peter's version is > full of jargon that I can't understand. I could probably figure it > out with a few hours and a search engine, but that really shouldn't be > necessary.
Really? Andrew's version doesn't even explain what excess-K is. Surely that's obscure jargon that requires an explanation. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
