On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote: > The earlier comment should make it clear that all the DEC_DIGITS != 4 > support is "historical". I didn't consider it appropriate to actually > rip out all the #ifs; I simply tried to make it clear where the > landmines were if anyone wanted to try experimenting with other > DEC_DIGITS values.
There is exactly one landmine: this patch. I really don't understand why you're so resistant to linking the DEC_DIGITS != 4 to it failing. After all, your V1 linked it to abbreviation silently not being enabled when numeric.c was built. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
