On 24 March 2015 at 11:46, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:

>
> On 24 March 2015 at 11:37, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
>> On March 24, 2015 12:35:28 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Paquier <
>> michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
>> >> I was attempting to set up a data set to test pg_rewind, when I
>> >encountered
>> >> an error.  I created a primary and standby, then:
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> # insert into utest (thing) values ('moomoo');
>> >> ERROR:  index "utest_pkey" contains unexpected zero page at block 0
>> >> HINT:  Please REINDEX it.
>> >>
>> >> This is built on commit e5f455f59fed0632371cddacddd79895b148dc07.
>> >
>> >Unlogged tables are not in WAL, and cannot be accessed while in
>> >recovery, so having an empty index relation is expected on a promoted
>> >standby IMO. Now perhaps we could have a more friendly error message
>> >in _bt_checkpage(), _hash_checkpage() and gistcheckpage() with an
>> >additional HINT to mention unlogged tables, but I am not sure that
>> >this is much worth it. Mentioning this behavior in the docs would be
>> >good instead.
>>
>> I think Thom's point is that he promoted the node...
>>
>> Thom, are you sure this want transient?
>>
>
> The index is unlogged until reindexing...
>
> # select oid, relname, relpersistence from pg_class where relname in
> ('test','test_pkey','utest','utest_pkey');
>   oid  |  relname   | relpersistence
> -------+------------+----------------
>  16387 | test       | p
>  16394 | test_pkey  | p
>  16398 | utest      | u
>  16405 | utest_pkey | u
> (4 rows)
>
> # reindex index utest_pkey;
> REINDEX
>
> # select oid, relname, relpersistence from pg_class where relname in
> ('test','test_pkey','utest','utest_pkey');
>   oid  |  relname   | relpersistence
> -------+------------+----------------
>  16387 | test       | p
>  16394 | test_pkey  | p
>  16398 | utest      | u
>  16405 | utest_pkey | p
> (4 rows)
>
> Which is think also raises the question, why are unlogged indexes made
> persistent by a reindex?
>

I should also mention that it becomes unlogged again when running VACUUM
FULL or CLUSTER on the table.

-- 
Thom

Reply via email to