On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did it tell you why? If it surrendered the lock to a competing process, > it should report that as previous INFO messages. If it doesn't give one of > those, then it probably just thinks there are some tuples it can't remove > yet somewhere. What did it give earlier up in the verbose output, for the > number of removed and nonremovable tuples? > I just had an extra look at that, and I just got trapped a0f5954a that bumped max_wal_size from 128GB to 1GB.. Sorry for the noise. -- Michael
