On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 7 February 2015 at 20:05, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote: >> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> >>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in >>> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint, >>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same >>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts? >> >> >> A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for >> locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so. > > Committed. We move forwards, slowly but surely. Thanks for the patch.
Cool! Thanks for showing up. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
