I'm not sure what the best way to handle the hand-off from patch contribution to reviewer/committer. If I start tweaking things then you send in a new version it's actually more work to resolve the conflicts. I think at this point it's easiest if I just take it from here.
I'm puzzled about the change from pg_hba_settings to pg_hba_conf. They're both ok but if pressed I would have preferred the original pg_hba_settings since that's consistent with the pg_settings view. There's no reason to quote tokens, that defeats the whole point of breaking the keywords into a separate column. Also there's no point in breaking out "all" but then still leaving "+foo" in the same column. My version had that moved into a new column as well called "recursive_roles". We could call that just "roles" or "groups" but I was opting to the more explicit. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
