On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Michael Paquier < > michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> > @Magnus: having the possibility to mark a patch as "returned with >> > feedback" without bumping it to the next CF automatically would be >> > cool to being moving on. >> Meh. "cool to have to help moving on". >> >> > Yeah, it's at the top of my list of priorities once I get some time to > spend on community stuff. Hopefully I can get around to it next week. There > is a small chance I can do it before then, but it is indeed small... > My apologies for that being delayed even longe rthan that. I've finally pushed the changes that: * Renames the current "returned with feedback" to "moved to next cf" * Adds a new status, "returned with feedback", that is the same as "rejected" in everything except the label (meaning it closes the patch out, but does *not* move it to the next CF). This was at least my understanding of the consensus :) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
