2015-05-01 7:40 GMT+09:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>: > Kouhei Kaigai wrote: >> > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> > > The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the >> > > system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of >> > > like to see progress on that front. >> > >> > Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to >> > advocate. >> > >> OK, I'll try to design a new regression test policy that is independent >> from the system's policy assumption, like unconfined domain. >> >> Please give me time for this work. > > Any progress here? > Not done. The last version I rebuild had a trouble on user/role transition from unconfined_u/unconfined_r to the self defined user/role... So, I'm trying to keep the user/role field (that is not redefined for several years) but to define self domain/types (that have been redefined multiple times) for the regression test at this moment.
Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
