At 2015-05-01 09:57:28 -0400, robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: > > If you don't object to this version, I'll commit it.
Looks fine to me, thank you. As for the non-backpatchable 0002, I agree with Andres that it should be included in 9.5; but I take it you're still not convinced? Should I add that to the CF separately for discussion, or what? -- Abhijit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
