On 05/11/2015 10:24 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:

In terms of adding a new GUC in 9.5: can't we take a stab at auto-tuning
this instead of adding a new GUC?  We already have a bunch of freezing
GUCs which fewer than 1% of our user base has any idea how to set.

That is a documentation problem not a user problem. Although I agree that yet another GUC for an obscure "feature" that should be internally intelligent is likely the wrong direction.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to