On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote: > > Magnus, > > > > * Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote: > > > We could also use the category that we have now, or even create the > concept > > > of a tag (where you can assign multiple ones). And then have a view > that > > > brings together a view of everything with a specific tag/category, > > > *regardless* of which CF it's on. > > > > I like the tag idea. > > +1 > > > > So the patch itself would live in whatever CF it was put in (or punted > to), > > > but you can get a global view. Which with a filter would make it easy > to > > > see "everything flagged as a bugfix that has not been committed". > Which I > > > think is the main thing we're looking for here, is it not? > > > > The biggest issue that I see with this is, again, trying to make sure > > people know that they *should* put bug patches into the CF and make it > > clear *which* CF to put them into. > > Maybe the answer to this is not to put it in any CF at all, and just > expect it to be seen through a tag view. I think the way things are now, a whole lof ot things could break if a patch is not on *any* commitfest... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/