On 2015-05-12 00:42:14 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > At 2015-05-11 19:15:47 +0200, and...@anarazel.de wrote: > > I don't really care how it's named, as long as it makes clear that > > it's not an exact measurement. > > Not having heard any better suggestions, I picked "pgstatapprox" as a > compromise between length and familiarity/consistency with pgstattuple.
I can live with that, although I'd personally go with pgstattuple_approx()... Other than that and some minor local changes I've made, I'm ready to commit this. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
