On 05/13/2015 02:12 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
This has had around 2 years of thought at this point. I don't agree it needs more thought.
Noted.
There is one clear use case for this and it is of benefit to many distributed architectures.
Right. What's your point?
I don't see what calamity will occur if we commit this. If you don't want a sequence AM, don't ever use this.
I'd like the API to be good for its purpose. Also, I did mention that the the current patch makes the situation slightly worse for people who never use this: it makes the log_cnt field non human-readable. That's a really minor thing, but it shows that it *does* matter how this is implemented, even if you only ever use the local seq AM.
- Heikki -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
