On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > Our manual says that archive_command should refuse to overwrite an existing > file. But to work-around the double-archival problem, where the same file is > archived twice, it would be even better if it would simply return success if > the file exists, *and has identical contents*. I don't know how to code that > logic in a simple one-liner though.
This is why we really, really need that pg_copy command that was proposed a while back. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
