On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I'm just going to remove the useless assertion for now. What you're >> proposing here may (or may not) be worth doing, but it carries a >> non-zero risk of breaking something somewhere, if anyone is relying on >> the signed-ness of that type. Removing the assertion is definitely >> safe. > > Fine for me. That's indeed possible for an extension.
Btw, I think that your commit message should have given some credit to Coverity for finding the problem. Not a big deal though. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
