On 2015-05-14 02:32:04 -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:50:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > > Andrew, is that a structure you could live with, or not? > > > > Others, what do you think? > > Andrew and I discussed that very structure upthread:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/87d26zd9k8....@news-spur.riddles.org.uk I don't really believe that that'd necesarily be true. I think if done like I sketched it'll likely end up being simpler than the currently proposed code. I also don't see why this would make combining hashing and sorting any more complex than now. If anything the contrary. > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20141231085845.ga2148...@tornado.leadboat.com > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20141231210553.gb2159...@tornado.leadboat.com > > I still believe the words I wrote in my two messages cited. I.e. that you think it's a sane approach, despite the criticism? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
