Simon Riggs wrote: > On 15 May 2015 at 19:03, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > Andres Freund wrote: > > > > > Alternatively we could make MultiXactIdIsRunning() return false < 9.3 > > > when in recovery. I think that'd end up fixing things, but it seems > > > awfully fragile to me. > > > > Hm, why fragile? It seems a pretty decent answer -- pre-9.3, it's not > > possible for a tuple to be "locked" in recovery, is it? I mean, in the > > standby you can't lock it nor update it; the only thing you can do is > > read (select), and that is not affected by whether there is a multixact > > in it. > > It can't return true and won't ever change for <9.3 so I don't see what the > objection is.
Pushed. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
