On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:05:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> With feature freeze behind us, I'd like to propose that now is a good >> >> time for a pgindent run. >> >> > +1, except I suggest we at least delay it until we have wrapped the new >> > minor releases, to make sure we don't conflict with any backpatching there. >> >> Sure, a couple of days won't make much difference. > > There was talk last time of pgindent-ing head and all back branches, > because a patch applied to head and back branches was historically only > pgindented in head, meaning that any future patches in that area could > not be easily backpatched. > > Do we want to do this?
I am personally not excited about that. I would rather leave the back-branches alone. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
