Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes:
> On 5/19/15 9:19 PM, FabrÃzio de Royes Mello wrote:
>> +1 to add a second parameter to current functions.
> Instead of allow_own_pid, I went with skip_own_pid. I have the function
> still returning true even when it skips it's own PID... that seems a bit
> weird, but I think it's better than returning false. Unless someone
> thinks it should return NULL, but I don't see that as any better either.
The implementation would probably be considerably simpler if you treated
these as separate functions at the SQL/C level, ie overload rather than
try to treat the added parameter as having a default.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
