On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That's a reasonable argument. So +1 to protocol from me. > > To satisfy Tom, I think this would need to have two modes: one where the > session can never be reset, for ultra security, and one where the session > can be reset, which allows security and speed of pooling.
I think the the second one is a lot more interesting, but I don't have a problem with having the first one, too, if somebody wants it. We can use one protocol message for both, with a 1-byte character field used to indicate which mode the client is requesting. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
