On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:15:14AM -0400, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 20 May 2015 at 03:13, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > > Brief committer appraisals are unhelpful individually, but patterns > > matter. I > > would make the questionnaire as simple as necessary to get 4-7 committer > > evaluations per patch. Prefer 30-second analyses from each of five > > committers, not 30-minute analyses from two.
> I'm happy to participate as a "triager" and will follow whatever process we > decide. > > I would very much like to make this something we do via the CF app. Good place for it. > I believe we should include in our thinking how we nurture and grow > reviewers, contributors and committers. I am more likely to treat a > low-value patch seriously if it is an early contribution from someone, for > example. Absolutely, though I am unsure how to specifically account for that in community processes. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
