On 05/26/2015 11:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
OK, I'm late to the party. But why exactly are we syncing absolutely
everything? That seems over-broad.
If we try to be selective, we risk errors of omission, which no one would
ever notice until someone's data got eaten in a low-probability crash
scenario. It seems more robust (at least to me) to fsync everything we
can find. That does require more thought about error cases than went
into the original patch ... but I think that we need more thought about
error cases even if we do try to be selective.
One thing perhaps we *should* be selective about, though, is which
symlinks we try to follow. I think that a good case could be made
for ignoring symlinks everywhere except in the pg_tablespace directory.
If we did, that would all by itself take care of the Debian scenario,
if I understand that case correctly.
People have symlinked the xlog directory. I've done it myself in the
past. A better rule might be to ignore symlinks unless either they are
in pg_tblspc or they are in the data directory and their name starts
with "pg_".
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
