On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:31:07AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > But really, the typedef list is the minor part what annoys me about > pgindent. That it completely butchers so many constructs (e.g. function > pointer typedefs, inline asm as extreme examples) is much worse. It's > also neigh on impossible to predict/keep the indentation pgindent will > use in many cases. Having to try to write code in a way that doesn't > break the re-indentation tool, even if it'd otherwise be fine, is just > absurd.
What does "break" mean here? Considering we are indenting 1.4M lines of code, skipping ASM files seems pretty minor. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
