Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> This is just something I noticed in passing. (I did a quick check of all
> the other uses of readlink in the source, and they do get this right.)
There's more random inconsistency than just this. I think we should
standardize on the coding exhibited at, eg, basebackup.c:1023ff, which
positively ensures that it won't scribble on random memory if the
call returns an unexpected value. Will fix.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
