Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes:
> The problem here is that these ranges are controlled by a
> decentralized patchwork of national standards bodies, and the ranges
> are always subject to revision. I think that it's egregious that
> contrib/isn imagines it can track that with a static array.
Well, that module has already been rewritten once (which proves that
there's an audience out there for it). Perhaps somebody will rewrite it
again to support a non-hardwired set of ranges. Now that we have the
concept of an extension configuration table, that'd be one possible
way to fix it ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
