> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 5:35 AM
> To: Robert Haas
> Cc: Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平); Thom Brown; Kohei KaiGai; Shigeru Hanada;
> pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Construction of Plan-node by CSP (RE:
> Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)
> 
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Tom, do you want to review this patch and figure out how to solve the
> > underlying problem?  If not, I will take care of it.  But I will be
> > unhappy if I put time and effort into this and then you insist on
> > changing everything afterwards, again.
> 
> [ sorry for slow response, been busy ]  I will take a look.
>
Tom, how about your availability?

>From my side, I adjust my extension (PG-Strom) to fit the infrastructure you 
>proposed,
then confirmed it is workable even if custom-scan, that replaced relations 
join, takes
more than two Path nodes in the custom_children list of CustomPath, with no 
exportiong
create_plan_recurse().

Below is an example of custom-scan (GpuJoin) that involves four relations join.
Its code base is the latest master + custom-join-children.v2.patch; unchanged 
from
the last post.

postgres=# explain analyze select avg(x) from t0 natural join t1 natural join 
t2 natural join t3 group by cat;
                                                                 QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HashAggregate  (cost=298513.77..298514.10 rows=26 width=12) (actual 
time=5622.028..5622.033 rows=26 loops=1)
   Group Key: t0.cat
   ->  Custom Scan (GpuJoin)  (cost=4702.00..249169.85 rows=9868784 width=12) 
(actual time=540.718..2075.566 rows=10000000 loops=1)
         Bulkload: On (density: 100.00%)
         Depth 1: Logic: GpuHashJoin, HashKeys: (cid), JoinQual: (cid = cid), 
nrows_ratio: 0.98936439
         Depth 2: Logic: GpuHashJoin, HashKeys: (bid), JoinQual: (bid = bid), 
nrows_ratio: 0.99748135
         Depth 3: Logic: GpuHashJoin, HashKeys: (aid), JoinQual: (aid = aid), 
nrows_ratio: 1.00000000
         ->  Custom Scan (BulkScan) on t0  (cost=0.00..242858.60 rows=10000060 
width=24) (actual time=8.555..903.864 rows=10000000 loops=1)
         ->  Seq Scan on t3  (cost=0.00..734.00 rows=40000 width=4) (actual 
time=0.019..4.370 rows=40000 loops=1)
         ->  Seq Scan on t2  (cost=0.00..734.00 rows=40000 width=4) (actual 
time=0.004..4.182 rows=40000 loops=1)
         ->  Seq Scan on t1  (cost=0.00..734.00 rows=40000 width=4) (actual 
time=0.005..4.275 rows=40000 loops=1)
 Planning time: 0.918 ms
 Execution time: 6178.264 ms
(13 rows)

Thanks,
--
NEC Business Creation Division / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>

Attachment: custom-join-children.v2.patch
Description: custom-join-children.v2.patch

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to