[ this is a bit roundabout, bear with me ]
I noticed that, contrary to project policy, a //-style comment snuck into
pg_regress.c a month or two back. I had had the idea that buildfarm
member pademelon would complain about such comments, given its stone-age
C compiler, but evidently not. After some experimentation it seems that
"gcc -ansi" can be used to throw errors for // comments, so I'm planning
to enable that flag on dromedary. However I found out that adding -ansi
also caused configure to stop selecting "-msse4.2", which seemed odd,
since that switch has no bearing on C language conformance. And it fell
back to the slicing-by-8 CRC implementation too.
Investigation showed that that's because -ansi causes the compiler to
stop defining __SSE4_2__, which configure supposes must get defined if
we are targeting an SSE 4.2 processor. This seems a bit dumb to me:
if we have determined that "-msse4.2" works, isn't that sufficient
evidence that we can use the intrinsics? Or if not, isn't there a less
fragile way to find out the target?
Also, it seems like the logic in configure.in is broken in any case:
if we are able to compile the intrinsics, should it not pick the
runtime-determination option for CRC? It isn't doing that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
