On 06/05/2015 07:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > So let's call it an alpha, or some other way of setting expectations > appropriately. But I think it's silly to maintain that the code is not in > a state where end-user testing is useful. They just have to understand > that they can't trust it with production data.
Yes ... that seems like a good compromise. Frankly, I'm testing 9.5 already; having alpha packages would make that testing easier for me, and maybe possible for others. We'd need to take into account that our packagers are a bit overworked this month due to update releases ... -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
