On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 02:01:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:39:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > Yeah, I think if we needed this out in an emergency, we would do it, but > > > > based on the volume of recent releases, it would be hard. Are we seeing > > > > user reports of failures even on the newest released versions, or are > > > > these preventive fixes? > > > > > > User reports of failures. See the thread about upgrading from 9.4.1 > > > to 9.4.2 and having the server *fail to start*. > > > > OK, are these fixed in 9.4.2 or would the same failure happen in 9.4.3? > > The fixes are not yet in any released branch, hence the rush to get > these out.
OK, now I understand. :-O We have known failures that are not patched, hence the desire for a release. I am a little concerned we are getting into a case where community members dedicated to this issue are asking for a release, and it is going into the core black hole, meaning there is no visibility on what actions core is taking to make a decision. (This is not a criticism, but rather an observation of how it looks from a non-core-member perspective.) -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
