On 2015-06-10 PM 05:53, Atri Sharma wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp >> wrote: > >> >> Perhaps the qual needs to be pushed all the way down >> to the Hash's underlying scan if that makes sense. >> > > And that is a Pandora's box of troubles IMHO unless done in a very careful > manner. >
More appropriately, that's a predicate (should not have called it a qual) derived from partitioning-optimization specific knowledge. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
