On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > I tend to agree with Peter. Not that we don't need a marketing > presence; we do (I think Great Bridge's marketing efforts are sorely > missed). But the point he is making is that the pgsql mailing lists go > to people who are generally unimpressed by marketing fluff. And they're > already "sold" on PG anyway. > > The right way to handle this next time is to generate a PR-style > press release to send to outside contacts, but to do our more > traditional, technically-oriented announcement on the mailing lists.
Agreed ... we tried to do 'two-in-one' on this one and it didn't quite work out as well as it could have ... next time, we'll go with both methods ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
