At 2015-06-11 14:38:03 +0900, langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote: > > > On the other hand, I don't like the idea of doing (3) by adding > > command line arguments to pg_basebackup and adding a new option to > > the command. I don't think that level of "flexibility" is justified; > > it would also make it easier to end up with a broken base backup (by > > inadvertently excluding more than you meant to). > > Maybe a combination of (2) and part of (3). In absence of any command > line argument, the behavior is (2), to exclude. Provide an option to > *include* it (-S/--serverlog).
I don't like that idea any more than having the command-line argument to exclude pg_log. (And people who store torrented files in PGDATA may like it even less.) -- Abhijit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
