Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:41:49PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> In any case, we oughta use two different error messages for the two cases, >>> as per my comment in the above thread. That seems like a back-patchable >>> bug fix, though of course any semantics change should only be in HEAD.
>> I have a slight preference to keep it to tightening up the wording on >> both the hint and the error (for example, "Perhaps you meant USING >> foo::type?") but leaving the behavior alone. > +1. The HINT could certainly provide situation-specific help. Fair enough, I'll go fix that but leave the semantics alone. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers