On 2015-06-19 11:16:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I wonder whether it's such a good idea for the postmaster to give > > up waiting before all children are gone (postmaster.c:1722 in HEAD). > > I doubt it.
Seconded. It's pretty bad to possibly not be able to start again after stopping it. I don't see the benefit in not waiting - sure, the poastmaster exits faster, but postgres hasn't shut down at that point... -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
