Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2015-06-20 10:55:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I dunno that tweaking the format would accomplish much. Where I'd love
>> to get to is to not have to write the data to disk at all (except at
>> shutdown). But that seems to require an adjustable-size shared memory
>> block, and I'm not sure how to do that. One idea, if the DSM stuff
>> could be used, is to allow the stats collector to allocate multiple
>> DSM blocks as needed --- but how well would that work on 32-bit
>> machines? I'd be worried about running out of address space.
> We could also just mmap() the stats file into memory in various
> processes. With a bit care it should be quite possible to only mmap a
> subsets of the file at once, taking care of the address space issues.
I think we should go into this with the mindset of re-using the DSM
infrastructure, rather than inventing a new mechanism of uncertain
portability.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
