On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-06-23 15:20 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >> I was thinking of a background worker flag, not a GUC. >> BGWORKER_QUIET, or something like that. But I guess we ought to just >> change it. > > I have not any problem with bg worker flag. The only question is, what > should be by default.
Well, if the flag is BGWORKER_QUIET, then the default behavior remains unchanged, but when that flag is used, the log level is reduced to DEBUG1. That has the advantage of not breaking backward compatibility. But I'm not sure whether anyone cares if we just break it, and it's certainly simpler without the flag. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
