On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Though TED sounds nice, the way to avoid another round of on-disk bugs is by > using a new kind of testing, not simply by moving the bits around.
I agree that we can do much better at testing than we traditionally have done, and I think pretty much everyone in the room for the developer unconference session on testing at PGCon was also in agreement with that. I really like the idea of taking purpose-built testing frameworks - like the one that Heikki created for the WAL format changes - and polishing them to the point where they can go into core. That's more work, of course, but very beneficial. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
