On 06/24/2015 11:11 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
Is there a way to implement triConsistent for only some of the strategy numbers?
No.
It looks like I would have to internally re-implement something like shimTriConsistentFn for each strategy number for which I don't want to implement the ternary system in full. Am I missing a trick?
Hmm. It didn't occur to me that you might want to implement tri-consistent for some strategy numbers and fall back to the shim-implementation for others. Do you have a real-world example of where that'd be useful?
- Heikki -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
