On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think you should be testing RelationNeedsWAL(), not the
>> relpersistence directly.  The same point applies for temporary
>> indexes.
>
> Indeed. Patch updated attached.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to