On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:So personally, > I would be inclined to put back the volatile qualifier, independently of > any fooling around with _Asm_double_magic_xyzzy calls. Or to put it > differently: where is the evidence that removing the volatile qual is a > good idea?
Personally, I have found that _Asm_double_magic_xyzzy makes is not nearly as cromulent as _Asm_triple_magic_plugh. But then, trying to figure out compiler intrinsics on strange platforms makes me feel very much like I'm in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
