On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > What would it take to get something like that which uses the > check-world target instead of just the check target? Without the > additional tests (like the isolation tests), some of these numbers > don't reflect the coverage of regularly run tests. While it is of > some interest what coverage we get on the 30 second `make check` > runs, I would be a lot more interested in what our coverage is when > the full 8.5 minute set of regression tests we have in git is run.
I agree. Obviously in some cases the coverage is bad because concurrency is naturally required. It's even more glaring that recovery codepaths are always all-red in coverage reports. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
