On 2015-07-13 23:48:02 +0900, Sawada Masahiko wrote: > But please image the case where old cluster has table which is very > large, read-only and vacuum freeze is done. > In this case, the all-frozen bit of such table in new cluster will not > set, unless we do vacuum freeze again. > The information of all-frozen of such table is lacked.
So what? That's the situation today… Yes, it'll trigger a anti-wraparound vacuum at some later point, after that they map bits will be set. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
