>> to handle DROP dependency behaviors properly. (On reflection, maybe >> better if it's "bernoulli(internal) returns tablesample_handler", >> so as to guarantee that such a function doesn't create a conflict with >> any user-defined function of the same name.) > > The probability of conflict seems high with the system() so yeah we'd need > some kind of differentiator.
Maybe it would be even better to have something like bernoulli(tablesample) where "tablesample" defined as pseudo-type like "trigger". -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
