On 7/21/15 10:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I agree; this change may have seemed like a good idea at the time, but > it was not. Failures during "make check"'s install step are rare enough > that you don't really need all that output in your face to help with the > rare situation where it fails. And for the buildfarm's purposes, it is > surely desirable to segregate that output from the actual check step.
It wasn't really an idea; it was just not necessary anymore. We can put it [directing the make install output into a file] back if that's what people prefer. > A possible alternative is to run the "make install" sub-step with -s, > but that could be objected to on the grounds that if it did fail, you'd > have a hard time telling exactly which step failed. I usually run the whole make check with -s. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
