Laurent Laborde wrote: > Friendly greetings ! > > What's the status of parallel clusterdb please ? > I'm having fun (and troubles) applying the vacuumdb patch to clusterdb. > > This thread also talk about unifying code for parallelizing clusterdb and > reindex. > Was anything done about it ? Because i can't see it and my work currently > involve a lot of copy/pasting from vacuumdb to clusterdb :)
Honestly, I have to wonder whether there are really valid use cases for clusterdb. Are you actually using it and want to see it improved, or is this just an academical exercise? > And no, (i'm pretty sure) i don't have the required postgresql knowledge to > do this unification if it isn't done already. You may or may not lack it *now*, but that doesn't mean you will continue to lack it forever. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
